I was recently invited to my first UNITE NY meeting and was deeply moved...
One of the most significant pieces of practical wisdom God has granted me in the past years is about the role of business-people in the Kingdom of God.
As a pastor I am compelled by my theology to believe that all people have gifts and callings to use for the edification of the Church and the advancement of the gospel in our world, but normal church practices often make that nothing more than pretty words. In our 'normal' way of thinking, the Kingdom is manifested most gloriously in the church, the church is most evident in the Sunday worship gathering, and the Sunday worship gathering is all about what the pastor says and does. In short, what the pastor does is Kingdom work, what everyone else does is pay for the privilege of observing the pastor 'doing Kingdom work.' This is, of course, not what God had in mind...
God has opened my eyes to the role of business-people, in large part, through my relationship with one person. My friend is a retired businessman who, several years ago, decided to include me in some of his projects. Through him I have learned the value of business-minded people working for Kingdom purposes outside of the walls of the church. He has his hands in endeavors of all kinds, job training programs, ministry training programs, housing renovation, job creation, refugee resettlement programs, medical services, college education for the poor. In all of these he brings his passion for the Kingdom, his crystalline focus on results oriented praxis, his drive to make every effort as effective and efficient as possible, his creativity and experience, and his intolerance of silly religious games. He also brings his wallet, his schedule, and a profound willingness to sacrifice for what he believes in.
In collaborating with my friend over the years, I have come to see the tremendous value in partnerships between kingdom-minded business people, and kingdom-minded pastors. This value goes well beyond the financial resources of the business community. The value is in the skills, practices, and paradigms of the business world, when those skills, practices, and paradigms are used under the direction of the Holy Spirit, and in partnership with other kingdom-minded people, to accomplish God's purposes in the places where we live, work, play, and worship.
While at the UNITE NY meeting I appreciated the encouragements of the speaker, and the opportunity to network, but I was moved most deeply simply by a room full of kingdom-minded business-people. I walked into a room full of people like my friend, and I couldn't help but get excited!
12.02.2015
11.23.2015
11.20.2015
11.09.2015
Perverted
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it."
Upton Sinclair
Upton Sinclair wrote one of the most influential works of literature in the history of the United States of America. His novel The Jungle was catalytic in the passage of the Food and Drug Act. Indeed, the act passed into law only four months after the book was published. Sinclair was pushed into the spotlight as a national figure for his work.
The book detailed the lives of immigrants in America, many of whom worked in the meat processing industry; at the time, a horrifyingly disgusting and dangerous workplace environment. Sinclair wrote the book as an intended expose on the plight of the poor and immigrant in our country, and the exploitive way the rich were treating them. The American public responded to Sinclair's book with great uproar, but not in the way Sinclair had hoped…
He is quoted as saying, "I aimed at the public's heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach."
One of the most gruesome episodes in the novel, (a worker falling into a lard-rendering vat, instantly dead, and unable to be removed), served not, as one might think, to provoke changes in worker safety, but to protect the purity of American lard by the immediate passage of federal legislation.
Upton Sinclair
==============
Upton Sinclair wrote one of the most influential works of literature in the history of the United States of America. His novel The Jungle was catalytic in the passage of the Food and Drug Act. Indeed, the act passed into law only four months after the book was published. Sinclair was pushed into the spotlight as a national figure for his work.
The book detailed the lives of immigrants in America, many of whom worked in the meat processing industry; at the time, a horrifyingly disgusting and dangerous workplace environment. Sinclair wrote the book as an intended expose on the plight of the poor and immigrant in our country, and the exploitive way the rich were treating them. The American public responded to Sinclair's book with great uproar, but not in the way Sinclair had hoped…
He is quoted as saying, "I aimed at the public's heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach."
One of the most gruesome episodes in the novel, (a worker falling into a lard-rendering vat, instantly dead, and unable to be removed), served not, as one might think, to provoke changes in worker safety, but to protect the purity of American lard by the immediate passage of federal legislation.
11.04.2015
Safety and Danger in the Church
We baptized several people on Sunday.
One of them was my son.
It was glorious!
People shared briefly of their decision to follow Christ, to be washed clean in His death, and remade in His resurrection. And then Pastor Cap and I plunged them into a feeding trough full of water!
At the baptism of the first adult, I saw gallons of water slosh over the side and onto the floor, water went everywhere. I thought, "well, its too late to stop it now, people are here to get baptized, and we will just clean up the mess later." …and then we kept right at it!
===================
Afterwards I got to thinking about the mess of the baptism, and what that says about the church as a whole.
So often we expect the church to be safe in all of the wrong kinds of ways. We don't want anyone to come in and bring any of the world in with them. We don't want anyone to come in who doesn't fit, who isn't tidy, who doesn't play by our rules. In short, we want our faith community to be comfortable for us. May our church never be this safe.
But what that ends up producing is a church culture that promotes hypocrisy, secrecy, and emotional isolation. If no messy people are allowed into the circle of christians, then we can't let anyone know about our own messiness. We have created a club for perfect people, and that is a very dangerous thing for a church to become. Dangerous in all of the wrong sorts of ways. May our church never be this dangerous.
Instead the church is supposed to be a safe place for messy people to let their messiness get dealt with. People are supposed to bring the world with them right into our community. The church is supposed to be a safe place for dark secrets to be exposed, it supposed to be a safe place for bad habits to be dealt with, its supposed to be a safe place for vulnerable wounds to be exposed and healed. May our church always be this safe.
The church is supposed to be dangerous too. Dangerous in the same way a show at Marine World is dangerous; you might get wet! Dangerous to our comfort, dangerous to our ego, dangerous to our need for control and our desire for gratification. Celebration is always a danger to decorum; just as worship is a danger to pride, fellowship is a danger to wealth, and glory is a danger to apathy. May our church always be this dangerous.
===================
One of them was my son.
It was glorious!
People shared briefly of their decision to follow Christ, to be washed clean in His death, and remade in His resurrection. And then Pastor Cap and I plunged them into a feeding trough full of water!
At the baptism of the first adult, I saw gallons of water slosh over the side and onto the floor, water went everywhere. I thought, "well, its too late to stop it now, people are here to get baptized, and we will just clean up the mess later." …and then we kept right at it!
===================
Afterwards I got to thinking about the mess of the baptism, and what that says about the church as a whole.
So often we expect the church to be safe in all of the wrong kinds of ways. We don't want anyone to come in and bring any of the world in with them. We don't want anyone to come in who doesn't fit, who isn't tidy, who doesn't play by our rules. In short, we want our faith community to be comfortable for us. May our church never be this safe.
But what that ends up producing is a church culture that promotes hypocrisy, secrecy, and emotional isolation. If no messy people are allowed into the circle of christians, then we can't let anyone know about our own messiness. We have created a club for perfect people, and that is a very dangerous thing for a church to become. Dangerous in all of the wrong sorts of ways. May our church never be this dangerous.
Instead the church is supposed to be a safe place for messy people to let their messiness get dealt with. People are supposed to bring the world with them right into our community. The church is supposed to be a safe place for dark secrets to be exposed, it supposed to be a safe place for bad habits to be dealt with, its supposed to be a safe place for vulnerable wounds to be exposed and healed. May our church always be this safe.
The church is supposed to be dangerous too. Dangerous in the same way a show at Marine World is dangerous; you might get wet! Dangerous to our comfort, dangerous to our ego, dangerous to our need for control and our desire for gratification. Celebration is always a danger to decorum; just as worship is a danger to pride, fellowship is a danger to wealth, and glory is a danger to apathy. May our church always be this dangerous.
===================
It wasn't just the water that was a little 'messy.'
We joined together with another congregation during the service. Both congregations had members to baptize, so we celebrated the unity of faith in 'one baptism' as proclaimed by St Paul. This meant we got to hear preaching that was different than normal, got to see baptisms performed in ways that were uncomfortable for some of us, and heard things said that we didn't all agree with.
I have to say, I was blessed to see the way people entered into the mess, cleaning up the water, engaging in relationships across dividing lines, and celebrating the beauty and potency of the Spirit's work in the lives of the saints. This is a picture of how the church is supposed to be safe in the right ways, and dangerous in the right ways...
11.02.2015
What is Needed for Unity to Flourish?
Be completely humble and gentle;
be patient, bearing with one another in love.
Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit
through the bonds of peace.
Ephesians 4:2-3
What, precisely, is meant by 'every effort?'
What hasn't been tried yet?
Remembering that Scripture commands 'every effort'
in the preservation of unity,
in the preservation of unity,
reflect on the places where disunity is present in your life.
====================
Humility is required. Humility is the recognition of one's proper place in the order of things. Knowing where you belong, and whom you belong to. Understanding what authority you have, and who's authority you are under. Knowing what wisdom you possess, and knowing what wisdom you lack. Recognizing that you cannot stand alone, and have been joined (by God!) to those who challenge the bonds peace. Humility is required for unity to flourish.
Gentleness is required. Harsh words and hard responses invite people to see us as their opponents. Condescending tones provoke inferiority and/or indignation. Strong actions, when taken without mutually agreed upon wisdom, lead to wounds; wounds lead to pain, mistrust, anger, and fear. Gentleness sets aside all of this, and invites trust. A gentle man can be trusted not to wound; even when he misunderstands, he does not misstep, because his steps are slow and deliberate. Gentleness is required for unity to flourish.
Patience is required. Perhaps the older word is better; long-suffering is required. It has been said, about the work of reconciliation, "if you are bleeding, you are doing it right." It has also been said, about the fellowship of Christians across cultural lines, "expect to offend, and to be offended." Patience is the willingness to tolerate discomfort, disagreement, confusion, pain, deprivation, misunderstanding, even egregious offense, with the expectation that the future will be better than the present. Without patience there can be no maturity, and maturity is a pre-requisite for unity. A mature believe understands that all holiness, all glory, all wisdom, and all godly power, comes into the community of humans through a process that takes time, energy, and obedience. Unity will not be sustained without the 'long obedience in the same direction.' Patience is required for unity to flourish.
10.31.2015
Leaders Get What They Want?
We often think that a leader is someone who gets to make decisions; a leader is someone who gets whatever they want. This couldn't be more wrong-headed; a godly leader is a person who no longer thinks about what would fulfill his own desires, and instead works hard to make the community healthy and fruitful. A leader shouldn't give people the things that he desires for himself, but instead, a leader should give people the things that they need to flourish.
Leaders don't do what makes themselves happy, they do what makes other people healthy.
10.14.2015
Racial Politics: Why our Rhetoric Matters
I heard an interview on the radio the other day…
I am not even sure of the station or the program as I was driving out of the area. But the program host was discussing with guests and callers the situation surrounding one of the recent shootings of black men by police officers, and the surrounding protests, the movements, the politics, the social forces, etc.
A woman called in and said something that I thought was profoundly important about race relations in our country.
She identified herself as an 'older, African-American, woman,' and she proceeded to say that in her experience white bigotry is no longer an important factor in our racial problems, rather white apathy is the problem. She talked about other factors (the history of bigotry, and the black community's own apathy), but she talked mostly about how problematic and inaccurate it was to diagnose the problem as 'white racism;' in her experience, most white people aren't racists, they just aren't willing to do much of anything about the plight of black communities if it costs them personally.
I thought this profoundly important for several reasons:
1) Its true: while it is true that bigotry endures in our day, it is not the problem that it once was. It is no longer acceptable by our culture, indeed calling someone a racist in many circles is a serious charge that most people will respond to with strong emotions. The majority of white people in America are completely in favor of a society where people of all colors can freely share in the wealth, power, and blessing of our nation, and they are personally willing to engage relationally with people of all colors. …but not if it costs them anything to do so!
2) Its informed: she had obviously spent enough time engaging with white people that she understood what was going on inside the hearts and minds of individuals and communities. This is not just about proximity, but also about a desire to understand those who are different than you.
3) Its honest: saying what is true about a situation, instead of throwing insults at one's socio-political opponents, is a display of integrity. It feels good to insult people, especially if they have hurt you. But calling someone a bigot, when you know that they are not a bigot, is simply dishonest.
4) Its helpful: imagine a Doctor who was so bent on the eradication of cancer that he diagnosed every patient he saw with cancer and gave them chemotherapy and radiation treatment. Compare that to a Doctor who was so concerned with the health of her patients that she carefully and methodically diagnosed each patient's symptoms for their various root causes and then applied the appropriate treatment for each individual case. It simply doesn't help to call someone a racist who isn't a racist. That usually only produces righteous indignation, and resolute opposition. It simply doesn't help to ignore apathy in a lazy person or a lazy society. Pointing at the real problem helps highlight the real solution. A misdiagnosis erodes trust and hurts everyone involved.
5) Its generous: it would be easier to point at the actual white racism that exists. It would be easier to point at the rhetoric of politicians who foment racial fear to gain votes. But instead, she chose to look beyond that, to give people the benefit of the doubt, and to seek to understand. She wanted to point at what was good in the white community and their response to racial politics.
6) Its hopeful: seeking to have an honest dialogue about a sticky topic is an indicator that you want to see progress. Too often sticky topics are simply used by those attempting to gain political power. Calling names, provoking anger, inciting fear, fomenting dissension, this is what we see politicians do with all divisive issues, and with race in particular. They do it so that they can get elected. But it doesn't help us heal, it actually gets in the way. To hear a woman speak this way is an indicator that she actually hopes for healing; she actually believes our society can change.
I am not even sure of the station or the program as I was driving out of the area. But the program host was discussing with guests and callers the situation surrounding one of the recent shootings of black men by police officers, and the surrounding protests, the movements, the politics, the social forces, etc.
A woman called in and said something that I thought was profoundly important about race relations in our country.
She identified herself as an 'older, African-American, woman,' and she proceeded to say that in her experience white bigotry is no longer an important factor in our racial problems, rather white apathy is the problem. She talked about other factors (the history of bigotry, and the black community's own apathy), but she talked mostly about how problematic and inaccurate it was to diagnose the problem as 'white racism;' in her experience, most white people aren't racists, they just aren't willing to do much of anything about the plight of black communities if it costs them personally.
I thought this profoundly important for several reasons:
1) Its true: while it is true that bigotry endures in our day, it is not the problem that it once was. It is no longer acceptable by our culture, indeed calling someone a racist in many circles is a serious charge that most people will respond to with strong emotions. The majority of white people in America are completely in favor of a society where people of all colors can freely share in the wealth, power, and blessing of our nation, and they are personally willing to engage relationally with people of all colors. …but not if it costs them anything to do so!
2) Its informed: she had obviously spent enough time engaging with white people that she understood what was going on inside the hearts and minds of individuals and communities. This is not just about proximity, but also about a desire to understand those who are different than you.
3) Its honest: saying what is true about a situation, instead of throwing insults at one's socio-political opponents, is a display of integrity. It feels good to insult people, especially if they have hurt you. But calling someone a bigot, when you know that they are not a bigot, is simply dishonest.
4) Its helpful: imagine a Doctor who was so bent on the eradication of cancer that he diagnosed every patient he saw with cancer and gave them chemotherapy and radiation treatment. Compare that to a Doctor who was so concerned with the health of her patients that she carefully and methodically diagnosed each patient's symptoms for their various root causes and then applied the appropriate treatment for each individual case. It simply doesn't help to call someone a racist who isn't a racist. That usually only produces righteous indignation, and resolute opposition. It simply doesn't help to ignore apathy in a lazy person or a lazy society. Pointing at the real problem helps highlight the real solution. A misdiagnosis erodes trust and hurts everyone involved.
5) Its generous: it would be easier to point at the actual white racism that exists. It would be easier to point at the rhetoric of politicians who foment racial fear to gain votes. But instead, she chose to look beyond that, to give people the benefit of the doubt, and to seek to understand. She wanted to point at what was good in the white community and their response to racial politics.
6) Its hopeful: seeking to have an honest dialogue about a sticky topic is an indicator that you want to see progress. Too often sticky topics are simply used by those attempting to gain political power. Calling names, provoking anger, inciting fear, fomenting dissension, this is what we see politicians do with all divisive issues, and with race in particular. They do it so that they can get elected. But it doesn't help us heal, it actually gets in the way. To hear a woman speak this way is an indicator that she actually hopes for healing; she actually believes our society can change.
10.12.2015
10.09.2015
God's (Most Frequent) Commandment
We are all familiar with the 10 Commandments; God's list of moral rules for the people of Israel. We have a tendency to view them as 'rules to prevent us from having too much fun' but in all honesty, they are actually rules that would provide for our greatest joy! Can you imagine a society in which those commandments were largely obeyed by all? No dishonesty, no theft, no murder, no rape, no manipulation, no cheating...
When we look to Jesus we see him practicing and teaching the 10 Commandments, but we also see him amending them in some ways. He claims that there are 'higher' or 'greater' commandments behind the list from the Covenant through Moses. The Greatest Commandments are first, to love God with all of our being, and second, to love our neighbor as ourselves. Indeed, if we were to practice these two commandments as a society, we would fulfill the other 10 without even thinking about them!
But for all our talk about the 10 Commandments, and the Great Commandments, we have forgotten about a very different sort of commandment. It is God's 'most frequent commandment.' It may not be on the list, but its the one he repeats more often than any other commandment. For some reason, whenever God is interacting with a person, or a people, He finds it necessary to repeat the following commandment, over and over again:
Do not fear.
I will leave aside, for the moment, reflections as to why standing in the presence of God, or one of His holy angels, would prompt us to fear. The question stands before us, can you imagine a society where we were not motivated by our fear? …our fear of each other, our fear of embarrassment, our fear of conflict, our fear of failure, our fear of pain and loss, our fear of death? Can you imagine a society of Christians who walked into every dark corner of our world, neigh every dark corner of our soul! with abiding hope and faith in the goodness and power of God to overcome that darkness?
That is the society of God's Children, it is the church that God hopes for.
Do not be afraid.
Don't be scared.
Be not afraid.
Fear not.
Don't be afraid.
Do not fear.
When we look to Jesus we see him practicing and teaching the 10 Commandments, but we also see him amending them in some ways. He claims that there are 'higher' or 'greater' commandments behind the list from the Covenant through Moses. The Greatest Commandments are first, to love God with all of our being, and second, to love our neighbor as ourselves. Indeed, if we were to practice these two commandments as a society, we would fulfill the other 10 without even thinking about them!
But for all our talk about the 10 Commandments, and the Great Commandments, we have forgotten about a very different sort of commandment. It is God's 'most frequent commandment.' It may not be on the list, but its the one he repeats more often than any other commandment. For some reason, whenever God is interacting with a person, or a people, He finds it necessary to repeat the following commandment, over and over again:
Do not fear.
I will leave aside, for the moment, reflections as to why standing in the presence of God, or one of His holy angels, would prompt us to fear. The question stands before us, can you imagine a society where we were not motivated by our fear? …our fear of each other, our fear of embarrassment, our fear of conflict, our fear of failure, our fear of pain and loss, our fear of death? Can you imagine a society of Christians who walked into every dark corner of our world, neigh every dark corner of our soul! with abiding hope and faith in the goodness and power of God to overcome that darkness?
That is the society of God's Children, it is the church that God hopes for.
Do not be afraid.
Don't be scared.
Be not afraid.
Fear not.
Don't be afraid.
Do not fear.
10.05.2015
Look in the Mirror
I am not nearly as impressed with the man
who can see the fault in his enemy
as I am with the man
who can see the fault in himself.
who can see the fault in his enemy
as I am with the man
who can see the fault in himself.
9.27.2015
Christian Prostitution
If you watch the first video, make sure you watch the second one too, its kinda the main point. The song he is talking about is the third video.
8.24.2015
Best Sci-Fi Movies
These are my favorite science fiction movies, sci-fi being one of my favorite genres…
…of course, I don't really like much sci-fi in movie form as Hollywood generally stinks at making good science fiction. I grew up reading 'hard' science fiction authors like Arthur C Clark and Isaac Asimov, and have been regularly disappointed by film treatments of the genre. Science fiction is essentially really smart, highly educated people thinking about the possible ramifications of future technologies and edgy scientific theories; as Robert Heinlein defined it, "realistic speculation about possible future events, based solidly on adequate knowledge of the real world, past and present, and on a thorough understanding of the nature and significance of the scientific method."
I loved (and still love) the mind-bending concepts, philosophical conundrums, and existential puzzles that are at the core of the genre. Hollywood, somehow, manages to take that and turn it into explosions in space, or monsters in space, or cute teens in space, or wizards in space, or superheroes in space, or… you get the idea.
So here is my list, its loosely arranged from most favorite on down, but they are all pretty interchangeable. For something to make my list it must meet the following criteria:
1) I've seen it.
2) It's science fiction. It is actually speculative about the universe in some way, while simultaneously consistent with what we know about the universe, and the other elements of the film (action, special effects, character development, cinematography, etc) don't overshadow the science fiction.
3) I like it.
So here goes…
===============
My Favorite Science Fiction Films
The Matrix
Primer
Minority Report
Predestination
Moon
Arrival (2016)
Planet of the Apes (1968)
Contact
Alien
Total Recall (Both versions)
The Martian
The Forgotten
Gattaca
Yup, the Matrix is number one. The reason for that is simple. I had been disappointed time and time again by Hollywood "sci-fi" and was jaded. I had seen the trailer that made the film look like sexy, leather clad, ninja-hackers, with guns, performing physically impossible dance moves and ritualized fight scenes. I had no interest in watching the movie.
Finally, a friend of mine (who had horrible taste in movies) wanted me to go see it with him because he was really into the rave scene and loved the clothes and the music, I went to pacify him. I walked into the theater expected typical drivel and was blown away.
In some ways I walk into every movie going experience hoping to match what happened to me the first time I saw the Matrix.
============================
Sci-Fi Movies I Didn't Like
Interstellar - I really liked the film's attention to detail, and its the first film I can think of that deals with the reality of time dilation (which is actually pretty standard fare for science fiction literature). But the absolutely bizarre "love transcends the space-time continuum" plot device completely ruined the movie for me.
2001 - I am aware of the fact that I can't really judge this film outside of the period in history during which it was made. But I saw it in the 90s and it just fell flat for me. It may very well be phenomenal as a film, and it objectively impacted both the industry and out culture. I just didn't like it as either film, or as science fiction. The homage to visuals and effects that are no longer awe-inspiring detracts from the story which Kubrick never really tells because he is too busy emoting. When I finally read Clarke's treatment of the film, I loved the story, but never have re-watched the movie. I recognize that this probably says a lot more about me (and what I want in a movie) than it does about the film, so be it. I didn't like it.
Snowpiercer - I just couldn't get past the absurd premise of "a post-apocalyptic world where train tracks never got destroyed, or need repairing."
============================
Movies that Aren't Actually Science Fiction!
Star Wars - This is pure fantasy. There is absolutely no attempt at scientific accuracy, or speculation about the universe, or technological prognostication.
Jurassic Park - Technically this would be science fiction as it is an exploration of the possible dangers of cloning technology. But that really is only the device by which the film explains itself. The film is actually a man vs dinosaur movie. I would argue that the negligible science fiction elements are completely swallowed up by the film itself.
Gravity - Its a film about an accident in space. It fails to be speculative in any way about the nature of the universe, or future technology. It could actually be classified as "historical fiction," seeing as how the first fatality in space occurred almost 50 years ago, and the technology depicted in the film is outdated.
Super Hero Movies - Pure fantasy.
…of course, I don't really like much sci-fi in movie form as Hollywood generally stinks at making good science fiction. I grew up reading 'hard' science fiction authors like Arthur C Clark and Isaac Asimov, and have been regularly disappointed by film treatments of the genre. Science fiction is essentially really smart, highly educated people thinking about the possible ramifications of future technologies and edgy scientific theories; as Robert Heinlein defined it, "realistic speculation about possible future events, based solidly on adequate knowledge of the real world, past and present, and on a thorough understanding of the nature and significance of the scientific method."
I loved (and still love) the mind-bending concepts, philosophical conundrums, and existential puzzles that are at the core of the genre. Hollywood, somehow, manages to take that and turn it into explosions in space, or monsters in space, or cute teens in space, or wizards in space, or superheroes in space, or… you get the idea.
So here is my list, its loosely arranged from most favorite on down, but they are all pretty interchangeable. For something to make my list it must meet the following criteria:
1) I've seen it.
2) It's science fiction. It is actually speculative about the universe in some way, while simultaneously consistent with what we know about the universe, and the other elements of the film (action, special effects, character development, cinematography, etc) don't overshadow the science fiction.
3) I like it.
So here goes…
===============
My Favorite Science Fiction Films
The Matrix
Primer
District 9
Time CrimesMinority Report
Predestination
Moon
Arrival (2016)
Planet of the Apes (1968)
Contact
Europa Report
12 Monkeys
Edge of Tomorrow
LooperEdge of Tomorrow
Alien
Total Recall (Both versions)
The Martian
The Forgotten
Gattaca
Dark City
Children of Men
Serenity
Inception
Serenity
Inception
Eternal Sunshine on the Spotless Mind
Finally, a friend of mine (who had horrible taste in movies) wanted me to go see it with him because he was really into the rave scene and loved the clothes and the music, I went to pacify him. I walked into the theater expected typical drivel and was blown away.
In some ways I walk into every movie going experience hoping to match what happened to me the first time I saw the Matrix.
============================
Sci-Fi Movies I Didn't Like
Interstellar - I really liked the film's attention to detail, and its the first film I can think of that deals with the reality of time dilation (which is actually pretty standard fare for science fiction literature). But the absolutely bizarre "love transcends the space-time continuum" plot device completely ruined the movie for me.
2001 - I am aware of the fact that I can't really judge this film outside of the period in history during which it was made. But I saw it in the 90s and it just fell flat for me. It may very well be phenomenal as a film, and it objectively impacted both the industry and out culture. I just didn't like it as either film, or as science fiction. The homage to visuals and effects that are no longer awe-inspiring detracts from the story which Kubrick never really tells because he is too busy emoting. When I finally read Clarke's treatment of the film, I loved the story, but never have re-watched the movie. I recognize that this probably says a lot more about me (and what I want in a movie) than it does about the film, so be it. I didn't like it.
Snowpiercer - I just couldn't get past the absurd premise of "a post-apocalyptic world where train tracks never got destroyed, or need repairing."
============================
Movies that Aren't Actually Science Fiction!
Star Wars - This is pure fantasy. There is absolutely no attempt at scientific accuracy, or speculation about the universe, or technological prognostication.
Jurassic Park - Technically this would be science fiction as it is an exploration of the possible dangers of cloning technology. But that really is only the device by which the film explains itself. The film is actually a man vs dinosaur movie. I would argue that the negligible science fiction elements are completely swallowed up by the film itself.
Gravity - Its a film about an accident in space. It fails to be speculative in any way about the nature of the universe, or future technology. It could actually be classified as "historical fiction," seeing as how the first fatality in space occurred almost 50 years ago, and the technology depicted in the film is outdated.
Super Hero Movies - Pure fantasy.
6.23.2015
Flat Earthers and Biblical Interpretation
I had my first encounter with a real live flat earther…
…ok, not exactly. But I did have a conversation with someone who is related to one.
My friend sent me a paper written from a flat-earth perspective and I thought I would post some of my response here:
As for the Biblical interpretation…
All I can say is that the paper is an example of what not to do with scripture. Taking metaphors/idioms and using them literally makes for good comedy, (I've got my eye on you) but it is a way to confuse things horribly in serious study. The person who wrote this paper hasn't thought through how their exegetical approach would carry out with other biblical passages.
For example, would Jesus' teaching in Matthew 10:16 require us to eat grass, walk around on four legs, and say "bahhh?" Or are we allowed to take Jesus' words as a metaphor? Again, I am quite confident that the author of this paper loves God, and reveres scripture, but I imagine that they don't take Jesus command (recorded in Luke 10:37) as a requirement to put wounded people on our donkeys and take them to the closest inn.
All that I would want is that the same lenses we wear when we read these two passages should also be worn when we attempt to understand what scripture might teach us about cosmology. Specifically, we should read God's book with the intention of understanding God's message. We rightly understand Matthew 10:16 to be Jesus' attempt to encourage humility, peacefulness, and innocence in the face of evil; we rightly understand Luke 10:37 as Jesus' attempt to encourage human compassion that trumps personal convenience and racial animosity.
We ought to also understand that scripture does not intend to speak to a physical model of the construction of the universe. The passages quoted in the paper are not God's attempt to teach us about the relationship between the sun, stars, heavens, planets, and our earth. They ARE intended to speak to the grandeur of God, or his sovereignty, or the mystery and beauty of the creation, or the destruction that is wrought when God's wrath is poured out on evil.
To 'read the Bible literally' is to take the Bible for what it is, not turn it into something else. Where the Bible is law, we must understand it the way we understand laws; where the Bible is prophecy, we must read it the way prophecy is read; where it is song lyrics, we must interpret them the way we interpret song lyrics; where it is narrative, we must understand it as a story. No one would take the jacket from a CD and use it as an argument about the curvature of the earth, so we ought not to do so with the Psalter...
…ok, not exactly. But I did have a conversation with someone who is related to one.
My friend sent me a paper written from a flat-earth perspective and I thought I would post some of my response here:
As for the Biblical interpretation…
All I can say is that the paper is an example of what not to do with scripture. Taking metaphors/idioms and using them literally makes for good comedy, (I've got my eye on you) but it is a way to confuse things horribly in serious study. The person who wrote this paper hasn't thought through how their exegetical approach would carry out with other biblical passages.
For example, would Jesus' teaching in Matthew 10:16 require us to eat grass, walk around on four legs, and say "bahhh?" Or are we allowed to take Jesus' words as a metaphor? Again, I am quite confident that the author of this paper loves God, and reveres scripture, but I imagine that they don't take Jesus command (recorded in Luke 10:37) as a requirement to put wounded people on our donkeys and take them to the closest inn.
All that I would want is that the same lenses we wear when we read these two passages should also be worn when we attempt to understand what scripture might teach us about cosmology. Specifically, we should read God's book with the intention of understanding God's message. We rightly understand Matthew 10:16 to be Jesus' attempt to encourage humility, peacefulness, and innocence in the face of evil; we rightly understand Luke 10:37 as Jesus' attempt to encourage human compassion that trumps personal convenience and racial animosity.
We ought to also understand that scripture does not intend to speak to a physical model of the construction of the universe. The passages quoted in the paper are not God's attempt to teach us about the relationship between the sun, stars, heavens, planets, and our earth. They ARE intended to speak to the grandeur of God, or his sovereignty, or the mystery and beauty of the creation, or the destruction that is wrought when God's wrath is poured out on evil.
To 'read the Bible literally' is to take the Bible for what it is, not turn it into something else. Where the Bible is law, we must understand it the way we understand laws; where the Bible is prophecy, we must read it the way prophecy is read; where it is song lyrics, we must interpret them the way we interpret song lyrics; where it is narrative, we must understand it as a story. No one would take the jacket from a CD and use it as an argument about the curvature of the earth, so we ought not to do so with the Psalter...
6.21.2015
Felicia Sanders is MY Hero
Felicia Sanders was the mother of Tywanza Sanders. Both Felicia and her son were in the Bible study with Dylann Roof when he began to shoot the people there with a gun he had brought to the meeting. Tywanza was killed in front of his mother. Felicia survived. At the bail hearing for the shooter, Felicia said the following words:
“We welcomed you Wednesday night in our Bible study with welcome arms. You have killed some of the most beautiful people that I know. Every fiber in my body hurts and I’ll, I’ll never be the same. Tywanza Sanders was my son. But Tywanza Sanders was my hero. Tywanza was my hero. … May God have mercy on you.”
Nadine Collier, daughter of victim Ethel Lance, said:
“I forgive you. You took something very precious away from me. I will never get to talk to her ever again. I will never be able to hold her again, but I forgive you, and have mercy on your soul. … You hurt me. You hurt a lot of people. If God forgives you, I forgive you.”
Wanda Simmons, granddaughter of Daniel Simmons, said:
“Although my grandfather and the other victims died at the hands of hate, this is proof, everyone’s plea for your soul, is proof that they lived in love and their legacies will live in love. So hate won’t win. And I just want to thank the court for making sure that hate doesn’t win.”
“We welcomed you Wednesday night in our Bible study with welcome arms. You have killed some of the most beautiful people that I know. Every fiber in my body hurts and I’ll, I’ll never be the same. Tywanza Sanders was my son. But Tywanza Sanders was my hero. Tywanza was my hero. … May God have mercy on you.”
Nadine Collier, daughter of victim Ethel Lance, said:
“I forgive you. You took something very precious away from me. I will never get to talk to her ever again. I will never be able to hold her again, but I forgive you, and have mercy on your soul. … You hurt me. You hurt a lot of people. If God forgives you, I forgive you.”
Wanda Simmons, granddaughter of Daniel Simmons, said:
“Although my grandfather and the other victims died at the hands of hate, this is proof, everyone’s plea for your soul, is proof that they lived in love and their legacies will live in love. So hate won’t win. And I just want to thank the court for making sure that hate doesn’t win.”
6.07.2015
Incarnational Ministry
A ministry of presence is a requirement for serving alongside the poor. We must come near to those we desire to serve. We must touch them, and they us. It is not until their problems become our problems that we will ever truly be able to minister. Not in the sense that we care about them so much that their problems burden us emotionally, but rather in the sense that the problems we face in our lives are the same ones they face in theirs. When we suffer the violence of living with corrupt or absent police officers, when our property values drop because of corrupt banking practices, when our schools are failing and our jobs are gone, then we will be trusted to minister.
6.05.2015
Decision-making and Delegating
Here are a couple articles that I found helpful:
Decision Tree
Communal Discernment
And here is a diagram that models consensus decision-making:
Decision Tree
Communal Discernment
And here is a diagram that models consensus decision-making:
5.28.2015
I'm a good person...
Whenever people find out I am a pastor they say all sorts of things. Often people will try to convince me of what a good person they are, its almost cute.
Recently I had someone tell me "I'm a good person, I always let people into my home, and help whoever needs help." The interesting thing was that this person was saying all of this to me to justify their present state of drunkenness, and the vulgarity that had been dripping from their mouth for the 30 minutes they were talking to me before they knew I was a pastor.
But when they said this, something clicked…
In the culture I grew up in, people would often say "I'm a good person…" but the rationale was different, "I'm a good person because I don't steal, use drugs, or hurt people."
But what this person told me was indicative of a different cultural norm, and they were definitely not the first person to show this to me, it was just the first time I had noticed it this clearly.
The culture of my upbringing defined 'goodness' as purity and righteousness.
The culture of many I interact with now define 'goodness' as hospitality and charity.
I'm not sure that one is better or worse, but the difference is there...
Recently I had someone tell me "I'm a good person, I always let people into my home, and help whoever needs help." The interesting thing was that this person was saying all of this to me to justify their present state of drunkenness, and the vulgarity that had been dripping from their mouth for the 30 minutes they were talking to me before they knew I was a pastor.
But when they said this, something clicked…
In the culture I grew up in, people would often say "I'm a good person…" but the rationale was different, "I'm a good person because I don't steal, use drugs, or hurt people."
But what this person told me was indicative of a different cultural norm, and they were definitely not the first person to show this to me, it was just the first time I had noticed it this clearly.
The culture of my upbringing defined 'goodness' as purity and righteousness.
The culture of many I interact with now define 'goodness' as hospitality and charity.
I'm not sure that one is better or worse, but the difference is there...
5.27.2015
How to Help
Go to the people
Live among them
Learn from them
Love them
Start with what they know
Build on what they have
But of the best leaders
When their task is done
The people will remark
"We have done it ourselves."
-------
Above is an anonymous proverb that captures the heart of discipleship. It also points at a Kingdom perspective in helping those in need. If we help in such a way that those we have helped are forever indebted to us, forever idolizing us, and forever looking to us for more help, then we haven't done for them what Jesus would do.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)